| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Saturday, February 28, 2015
The Overlooked Importance of Vitamin D Receptors
Friday, February 27, 2015
Living During the Dawn of DNA Authentication
Another issue from Patrick Cox ix worth a read (a few times!)

Patrick Cox
Editor, Transformational Technology Alert
Living During the Dawn of DNA Authentication
BY PATRICK COX
FEBRUARY 27, 2015
The biotech revolution continually surprises me. Exponential increases in computer technologies are powering biotech progress in ways that I never imagined.
Among the most unexpected developments, the result of rapidly improving analytical bioinformatics, is the emergence of remarkably effective “supplements” that I talked about last week. Because these molecules fix systemic problems associated with breakdowns in our biological systems due to aging, they act suspiciously like panaceas, which of course we have always known do not exist; unless they do.
Another of my favorite surprises is Stanford University’s AVAcore thermoregulatory biotechnology, which increases the effectiveness of physical training as much as a pretty strong dose of steroids but without the side effects. I’m not sure I mentioned it, but the German World Cup team bought and used dozens of the AVAcore devices before and during their successful Cup run. No sports team in the world is more scientifically sophisticated or well-funded than the German World Cup team, so this is very cool.
I actually knew that Die deutsche Fußballnationalmannschaft were using AVAcore, but couldn’t talk about it. The team didn’t seem to want word of their secret advantage leaking, but a sports writer for the UK Telegraphbroke the news, so I feel free to point it out. According to the article, England passed on the use of the technology because the team’s scientists wanted more time to do tests. It’s too bad. I like England and doubt they’ll make that mistake again.
For those of you who use AVAcore, I’ve heard a rumor that the German scientists found that recovery from vigorous exercise is faster if the device is used on the left hand at heart level with the feet elevated. This makes sense since the arterial distance from the hand to the heart is shorter on the left than the right. Once more, I have no financial arrangement with AVAcore, but I am an unapologetic fanboy because I’m making gains that you’re just not supposed to make at my age.
Various academic studies have shown AVAcore accelerates gains in multiple populations for aerobic as well as anaerobic activity. In my case, my gains may also have something to do with the supplements I discussed last week. Mr. Mauldin, by the way, is getting absolutely buff. Regardless, recent research shows that physical strength is the fitness metric that correlates most strongly with life expectancy so I’m happy to be getting stronger.
Equally surprising to me is the arrival of absolute physical authentication. If I hadn’t been involved in encryption technologies in the early days of the Internet, the value of authentication might not have been so obvious to me. Typically, when I explain to people the importance of physical authentication, the ability to accurately determine the identity of a thing, there’s a learning curve.
Back when the Internet was being born, and I was consulting at the seminal Netscape Communications, the problem of authentication posed a huge problem for those who wanted to do business via the Web. Obviously, online commerce wouldn’t be possible if we couldn’t be sure where data comes from. Simple password technologies work fine in many cases. In more important instances, such as the transfer of money, we rely on various strong encryption technologies to authenticate the players in financial transactions.
The ability to know with complete confidence the provenance and identity of physical objects is just as valuable, but it’s never really been possible before. Counterfeiters, especially those backed by organized crime, have proven themselves amazingly capable of passing off fakes as the real thing.
This has created an enormous problem. The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) estimates that 10 to 15 percent of the global economy, well over a trillion dollars a year, is lost to counterfeiting. Even if this estimate is high by a factor of two, it’s still useful for conceptualizing the scope of the counterfeit problem. Moreover, many sectors most impacted by counterfeiting have significant implications in terms of public safety.
The World Health Organization says that the 10 percent of drugs that are fake are causing serious problems. WHO cites research indicating that 200,000 people die annually due to fake malaria drugs alone. Counterfeit chips also pose health threats if they appear in automobiles, airplanes or military computers. Significant numbers of fake chips have, in fact, been found in all these applications.
Experts say that about 30 percent of the chips in your computer are probably counterfeit, accounting for a disproportionate percentage of failures. Think about that the next time your computer goes down. There’s better than even odds that it’s because someone’s slipped a shoddy chip into the supply line somewhere.
Counterfeiting is also an enormous problem in many agricultural sectors. The highest-end cottons and wools as well as coffees are replaced with cheaper substitutes at an astonishing rate; perhaps as high as 10 times the actual supply.
For the military, counterfeit chips are not just a safety issue, though they are that. Foreign intelligence services have long had espionage programs dedicated to inserting altered chips into military supply lines. These chips have also been found in consumer products ranging from USB thumb drives to vaping devices. They can be used to plant malware designed to gather intelligence or even sabotage critical systems. When you hear discussions of cybersecurity, counterfeit chips are a critical part of the picture.
Now imagine a world where it would be easy to immediately verify the absolute authenticity of any physical item, anywhere and anytime. Well, starting last week, we live in that world. The key is DNA, the densest, most versatile and durable form of information storage in existence. The amount of DNA that would fit on the head of a pin can be encoded with more information than the average physical library.
Today, this property of botanical DNA is being exploited to encode complex authentication information that cannot be replicated or decoded. Coded DNA, unlike mathematical encryption schemes, can’t be broken no matter how many supercomputers are dedicated to the task. Without access to the “key,” encoded DNA bonded to some physical item can therefore provide absolute authenticity. For other techno-geeks, DNA authentication is comparable to the ultimate one-time pad (OTP) and is therefore uncrackable.
Plagued by the problem of counterfeiting in their supply chains, the US military was the first to legally require DNA authentication to protect critical defense systems. Internationally, the high-end cotton and wool industries are rapidly adopting DNA authentication to prevent counterfeiting. In Europe, the technology is being used with incredible success to protect high-value items like jewels, metals, and cash-in-transit.
One of the most important impacts of the deployment of this biotechnology is that it immediately results in much higher detection rates of stolen items as well as conviction of thieves. Criminals count on the ability to resell stolen items. If users can quickly identify a good as stolen, they are unlikely to buy it and the criminal is much more likely to be caught and convicted. This, in turn, has led to dramatic reductions in crime rates wherever DNA authentication has been implemented.
Criminologists know that criminals, especially those involved in organized crime, calculate risks when they plan crimes based on the odds of being caught and convicted. By raising the odds of those outcomes, DNA authentication is able to significantly reduce crime rates. Experience indicates that halving crimes of theft in industries and areas protected by DNA authentication is a realistic expectation.
So let’s go back to the ICC’s estimate of the scope of counterfeiting. Cutting out their inclusion of file sharing, which can’t be stopped, let’s say that 10 percent of the world economy is being degraded by counterfeiting. There’s also, however, the cost of property crime, which is addressable through DNA authentication. It’s difficult to determine what that impact is. The World Bank says, in Facets of Globalization, that property crime accounts for about .5 of GDP in America and three times that in Latin America. There are, however, secondary costs associated with property crime such as law enforcement and penal expenses that account for several percentage points of global GDP. Still, let’s leave the estimate of GDP loss addressable by DNA authentication at 10 percent.
The cost of DNA authentication services is very low compared to the payoffs, which has run 1 to 100 in some applications. Every dollar, euro, or pound spent has returned a hundred. Recently, the ability to read DNA authentication marks moved from the lab to the field. Now, portable polymerase chain reaction (PCR) readers can authenticate products wherever there is a need to validate the identity of some physical item. The actual portable device is the size of a toaster attached to a laptop and can authenticate a marker in less than a half hour.
On a humanitarian level, the benefit that this technology will deliver is enormous. If less than half of counterfeiting and property crime is stopped by DNA authentication, it could reasonably lead to an improvement of three or four percent to the world economy over time, which would be compounded on an annual basis permanently. This is a historic technological leap for our species and I think the emergence of an authenticated economy will be a hallmark of the 21st century.
Sincerely,

Patrick Cox
Editor, Transformational Technology Alert

Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Vitamin D deficiency linked more closely to diabetes than obesity
People who have low levels of vitamin D are more likely to have diabetes, regardless of how much they weigh, according to a new study published in the Endocrine Society's Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.
The results help clarify the connection between vitamin D, obesity and diabetes. According to the Society's Scientific Statement on the Non-skeletal Effects of Vitamin D, studies have found that people who have low levels of vitamin D are more likely to be obese. They also are more likely to have Type 2 diabetes, prediabetes and metabolic syndrome than people with normal vitamin D levels.
Vitamin D helps the body absorb calcium and maintain bone and muscle health. The skin naturally produces this vitamin after exposure to sunlight. People also absorb smaller amounts of the vitamin through foods, such as milk fortified with vitamin D. More than 1 billion people worldwide are estimated to have deficient levels of vitamin D due to limited sunshine exposure.
"The major strength of this study is that it compares vitamin D levels in people at a wide range of weights (from lean to morbidly obese subjects) while taking whether they had diabetes into account," said one of the study's authors, Mercedes Clemente-Postigo, MSc, of Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA) at Complejo Hospitalario de Málaga (Virgen de la Victoria) and Universidad de Málaga in Malaga, Spain.
The cross-sectional study compared vitamin D biomarkers in 118 participants at the university hospital Virgen de la Victoria in Malaga as well as 30 participants from the Hospital Universitari Dr. Josep Trueta in Girona, Spain. All participants were classified by their body-mass index (BMI) as well as whether they had diabetes, prediabetes or no glycemic disorders. Researchers measured levels of vitamin D in the participants' blood streams and vitamin D receptor gene expression in adipose tissue.
The analysis found that obese subjects who did not have glucose metabolism disorders had higher levels of vitamin D than diabetic subjects. Likewise, lean subjects with diabetes or another glucose metabolism disorder were more likely to have low levels of vitamin D. Vitamin D levels were directly correlated with glucose levels, but not with BMI.
"Our findings indicate that vitamin D is associated more closely with glucose metabolism than obesity," said one of the study's authors, Manuel Macías-González, PhD, of Complejo Hospitalario de Málaga (Virgen de la Victoria) and the University of Málaga. "The study suggests that vitamin D deficiency and obesity interact synergistically to heighten the risk of diabetes and other metabolic disorders. The average person may be able to reduce their risk by maintaining a healthy diet and getting enough outdoor activity."
Story Source:
The above story is based on materials provided by Endocrine Society. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.
The results help clarify the connection between vitamin D, obesity and diabetes. According to the Society's Scientific Statement on the Non-skeletal Effects of Vitamin D, studies have found that people who have low levels of vitamin D are more likely to be obese. They also are more likely to have Type 2 diabetes, prediabetes and metabolic syndrome than people with normal vitamin D levels.
Vitamin D helps the body absorb calcium and maintain bone and muscle health. The skin naturally produces this vitamin after exposure to sunlight. People also absorb smaller amounts of the vitamin through foods, such as milk fortified with vitamin D. More than 1 billion people worldwide are estimated to have deficient levels of vitamin D due to limited sunshine exposure.
"The major strength of this study is that it compares vitamin D levels in people at a wide range of weights (from lean to morbidly obese subjects) while taking whether they had diabetes into account," said one of the study's authors, Mercedes Clemente-Postigo, MSc, of Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA) at Complejo Hospitalario de Málaga (Virgen de la Victoria) and Universidad de Málaga in Malaga, Spain.
The cross-sectional study compared vitamin D biomarkers in 118 participants at the university hospital Virgen de la Victoria in Malaga as well as 30 participants from the Hospital Universitari Dr. Josep Trueta in Girona, Spain. All participants were classified by their body-mass index (BMI) as well as whether they had diabetes, prediabetes or no glycemic disorders. Researchers measured levels of vitamin D in the participants' blood streams and vitamin D receptor gene expression in adipose tissue.
The analysis found that obese subjects who did not have glucose metabolism disorders had higher levels of vitamin D than diabetic subjects. Likewise, lean subjects with diabetes or another glucose metabolism disorder were more likely to have low levels of vitamin D. Vitamin D levels were directly correlated with glucose levels, but not with BMI.
"Our findings indicate that vitamin D is associated more closely with glucose metabolism than obesity," said one of the study's authors, Manuel Macías-González, PhD, of Complejo Hospitalario de Málaga (Virgen de la Victoria) and the University of Málaga. "The study suggests that vitamin D deficiency and obesity interact synergistically to heighten the risk of diabetes and other metabolic disorders. The average person may be able to reduce their risk by maintaining a healthy diet and getting enough outdoor activity."
Story Source:
The above story is based on materials provided by Endocrine Society. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.
Sunday, February 22, 2015
Bitterness, forgiveness and Health
Stephen Post: Learn to Forgive Because Bitterness is Bad For Your Health
- Professor Stephen Post is well known for his writings on the health benefits of helping others. In this video, he walks us through the many reasons why practicing forgiveness can be both therapeutic and rejuvenating. After all, studies show that people who show a proclivity to hostile emotions tend to die earlier due to heart failure. That's why the James Lang Theory of Emotions posits the emotional and physiological benefits of small acts of kindness.
Friday, February 20, 2015
Mixing Health and Tech Investment Ideas is Not Always Bad
More Information
February 20, 2015
|
Answering Your Supplement Questions
Today I’d like to answer multiple questions sent to me regarding last week’s issue, in which I discussed the supplements that Mr. Mauldin and I are taking. By way of explanation, I didn’t include links to the actual products I discussed for the simple reason that I don’t want to give the impression that we’re recommending these products for financial reasons.I think that most people know it’s possible today for vendors to track where links come from. Some organizations give the linkers a cut of their revenues. Amazon.com does this through its affiliate program, but we’re not doing that.Personally, it always sort of irritates me when organizations appear to be hawking supplements because it makes me question their objectivity; so I didn’t include links. I’ve been convinced to do otherwise, however, in the explanations below. Let me clarify that we have no financial arrangement with anyone regarding these supplements. I write about them, and take them, based solely on the emerging science. Before you take anything yourself, you should always review the latest literature and speak with your physician.My interest is driven not just by a desire to be as healthy as possible, by the way; I’m also convinced that breakthroughs in biotech analytical tools are making it possible to find rather simple compounds that will have large impacts on health and demographics. Since demographic change is having an enormous impact on our economy and politics, we should be interested in anything with the potential to significantly increase healthspans and alter the makeup of the population.Since we’re talking about supplements, I should start with the most misunderstood: vitamin D. Everybody takes some. What has changed recently, however, is the consensus regarding optimal dosages. In fact, you can’t really say how much vitamin D you should take. It’s your 25-hydroxyvitamin D blood level that really matters. Different individuals will need very different doses of oral vitamin D to accomplish the target range recommended by the top researchers in this field, which is 40-60 ng/mL.I realize, by the way, that there are still some people in government science organizations that disagree with me. If you think about virtually any area of nutrition in which government has given guidelines over the past 50 years, there is a near 100 percent record of getting it wrong. Rather than go over the new research again, let me direct you to the University of California project dedicated to increasing understanding about D. It’s GrassrootsHealth, which you can access at this link.The thing I really like about this organization is that they offer a test for D levels, which is inexpensive compared to the cost of the average lab test. A superior solution is to find a doctor, like mine, who keeps up with the literature and prescribes a full blood workup regularly. I’m about two weeks late for my blood work now, by the way, but I’ve been overwhelmed of late.If you monitor the flood of new studies being published about vitamin D, it’s hard not to come to the conclusion that a program of societal supplementation would extend average healthspans enough to solve most of our healthcare budget problems. This assumes, of course, that people continued working and investing through the years of added health. If, however, they decided to use the extra years collecting retirement benefits, it would exacerbate the already enormous problem of unfunded entitlements for the aged, which is the main driver behind the debt crisis.Whenever anybody asks me about supplements, my standard answer is to take vitamin D3 before you worry about anything else. Dr. Michael Holick, who pioneered the new research on vitamin D, suggests that about 4,000 units a day will get most but not all healthy people up to about 40 ng/mL. My blood levels are typically closer to 60 ng/mL, but I live in South Florida and spend a little time in the sun most days.If you live farther north, however, the sun may not provide much help for much of the year. UVB is missing for most of the day in northern latitudes but is required for D synthesis. Sunshine has benefits other than vitamin synthesis, though. A Scottish study showed that people with greater but not extreme exposure to sunshine had statistically significantly lower blood pressure even when there was no ultraviolet B (UVB) present. This is apparently due to increased production of nitric oxide.When I got my D levels up where they should be about seven or eight years ago, the impact on my health was immediate and palpable. You can get D3 from Amazon.com here, but I take whatever brand my nutritional biologist wife happens to pick up at Walmart. I don’t worry about brands and have taken many. I know my serum blood levels are where I want them to be, so all the major brands seem to have worked.Last week, I concentrated on nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide plus (NAD+) precursors, based on the huge amount of research coming out now about this emerging area of science. Nicotinamide riboside (NR) is getting the most attention. Not only has NR been endorsed recently by several famous scientists, the first human studies showed that a single dose raises NAD+ levels.ChromaDex is the only supplier of nicotinamide riboside, a natural substance found in milk, as it owns the usage and manufacturing patents. It is brand-named Niagen, but ChromaDex does not sell the product directly. It’s available through Amazon.com and elsewhere. John and I take the High Performance Nutrition brand in the black and blue bottle.Incidentally, the ChromaDex scientific advisory board is chaired by Nobel laureate Roger Kornberg, a Professor at Stanford Medical School. His Nobel prize in Chemistry in 2006 was for research on the molecular basis of eukaryotic transcription, which my son and I discuss around the dinner table occasionally. When Kornberg accepted the role as chair of the SAB, he specifically cited his interest in NR due to his father’s research.Kornberg's father was also a Nobel prize winner. A professor of biochemistry at Stanford, the late Arthur Kornberg won the prize for physiology or medicine in 1959 and pioneered nicotinamide riboside research while at the NIH.“Given my father’s noteworthy early research of nicotinamide riboside,” the younger Kornberg said, “I have been following ChromaDex’s progress on developing its Niagen nicotinamide riboside as well as the enormous amount of published research that speaks to the health benefits of NR.”The MIT recipe referenced here includes another ChromaDex product, pterostilbene, which occurs naturally in blueberry skin. John and I have been taking both of these molecules for several years now. It’s available under the trade-name pTeroPure from several sources, including Amazon.com. Though others sell pterostilbene, I don’t trust other brands that don’t use the ChromaDex product.Another NAD+ precursor that we’ve both taken for several years is oxaloacetate. As is the case with NR, there is only one supplier which owns usage and manufacturing patents on the heat-stabilized version currently being used by universities researching efficacy in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. The company, of course, makes no medical claims as that would bring various government agencies down on its head like granite slabs dropped from helicopters. Free speech? Regardless, it’s trade-named benaGene, which you can also get through Amazon.com, butwe get it from the manufacturer here.Oxaloacetate is a naturally occurring molecule that plays a critical role in the citric acid cycle and other cellular functions. It increases NAD+ through an entirely different mechanism of action than NR’s, so we take them both. It may not be necessary but it will be years before definitive information is generated.We also take acetyl-L-carnitine because it has been shown in animal studies to work synergistically with oxaloacetate. My wife and doctor have both recommended L-carnitine for a while, but it was this study showing complete restoration of long-term potentiation (LPT) in rats with cerebral ischemia, or stroke, that made me start taking it assiduously.Long-term potentiation (LPT) refers to the ability of brain synapses to increase signal transmission based on repeated activity. In other words, the study shows that oxaloacetate and L-carnitine completely restored the ability to learn in rats suffering from induced stroke. This seems like a very good sign to me, since LPT tends to decrease with age in humans. Given the option, I’d like to preserve the ability to learn as long as possible. Maybe, someday, I’ll even learn how to spell “rhythm” without a spell checker and remember my in-laws’ names.Anecdotally, a lot of people who use either NR or oxaloacetate report a lifting of mental “fogginess.” Dave Asprey, better known as the Bulletproof Executive, sells a coffee with oxaloacetate for that purpose. I don’t know, by the way, if his product is cost-effective. I haven’t looked that closely at his materials. Coffee on its own, by the way, is incredibly healthful for most people unless they let it interfere with sleep. I’ll spend one paragraph on coffee before returning to acetyl-L-carnitine and oxaloacetate.I’ve gone into the literature on the subject of coffee and caffeine innumerable times but it’s solid science. In previous articles, I’ve linked to this special issue of the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease that categorized coffee as “disease-modifying” for AD. Editor Dr. Mark Smith, one of the world’s leading Alzheimer’s researchers before his accidental death a few years ago, was so enthusiastic about coffee as therapy that he made the issue free to download. In terms of cost-effectiveness, coffee has got to rank alongside vitamin D in efficacy.Returning to the subject of acetyl-L-carnitine, this naturally occurring substance breaks down in the blood to transport fatty acids into the mitochondria for conversion to adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which is the only form of energy our bodies can utilize. Acetyl-L-carnitine seems to be particularly important for those who exercise strenuously.It’s certainly possible that the same repair of long-term potentiation observed in rats will take place in humans. Anyway, acetyl-L-carnitine is generally considered beneficial on its own, as is oxaloacetate, so there doesn’t seem to be much downside to supplementation with both while the upside is potentially dramatic.Another supplement related to ATP energy production that we take isubiquinol, a somewhat new and reduced (as opposed to oxidized) form of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) that appears to be more active. Ubiquinol is a critical part of the electron transport chain, transferring electrons in the process of synthesizing ATP. It’s also available through Amazon.com, as isacetyl-L-carnitine, though my wife buys them both at Walmart, I think.Then, of course, John and I are both using up the last of our anatabine citrate, which is no longer commercially available. I assume, however, that someone is hunting for another NF kappa B moderator. There’s an awful lot of unstudied alkaloids out there, and some very smart people know about the unprecedented data generated in the animal and human anatabine trials. Rock Creek Pharmaceuticals is miles ahead on the drug development path as they have permission to begin human trials for arthritis in the UK, but someone else may go after the supplement market.Hopefully, this answers all the questions I received. This isn’t a complete list of the supplements that John and I take, but I think it covers the most important and least known. Let me reiterate once more that we have no financial arrangements with the manufacturers of any of these products.My hope is you find the above discussion of supplements and the emerging science behind them compelling, and can begin your own research with the data I’ve provided.
Was this email forwarded to you?
Register to receive Patrick Cox's Tech Digest for free. |
Thursday, February 19, 2015
Self Massage for the Neck and Shoulders.
Neck pain can be very stressful and come from a lot of different sources. Doing AIS Stretching will help move you back to a more normal neck and shoulder mobility. But it is important to massage the muscles and tendons in this area as well in order to promote blood flow and healing.
These videos present a few different approaches to dealing with neck pain. I am including them here as I think they are helpful methodologies.
In watching these videos keep in mind the AIS concepts of slow moves into stretch, limited stretching of a few degrees each repetition for only about two seconds on each repetition. (approximately two seconds) If at any time you encounter severe pain it best to exercise some common sense and get yourself into the doctor.
Self Massage for Neck Pain
Shoulder & Neck Acupressure Points for Relieving Stress
Spice up your memory: Just one gram of turmeric a day could boost memory
Spice Up Your Memory
Adding just one gram of turmeric to breakfast could help improve the memory of people who are in the very early stages of diabetes and at risk of cognitive impairment. The finding has particular significance given that the world's ageing population means a rising incidence of conditions that predispose people to diabetes, which in turn is connected to dementia.
Early intervention could help to reduce the burden, whether by halting the disease or reducing its impact, said Emeritus Professor Mark Wahlqvist, from the Monash Asia Institute at Monash University.
Professor Wahlqvist recently led a study in Taiwan that tested the working memory of men and women aged 60 or older who had recently been diagnosed with untreated pre-diabetes.
"Working memory is widely thought to be one of the most important mental faculties, critical for cognitive abilities such as planning, problem solving and reasoning," he said.
"Assessment of working memory is simple and convenient, but it is also very useful in the appraisal of cognition and in predicting future impairment and dementia."
In the placebo-controlled study, subjects were given one gram of turmeric with an otherwise nutritionally bland breakfast of white bread. Their working memory was tested before and some hours after the meal.
"We found that this modest addition to breakfast improved working memory over six hours in older people with pre-diabetes," Professor Wahlqvist said.
Turmeric is widely used in cooking, particularly in Asia. Its characteristic yellow colour is due to curcumin, which accounts for 3 to 6 per cent of turmeric and has been shown by experimental studies to reduce the risk of dementia.
"Our findings with turmeric are consistent with these observations, insofar as they appear to influence cognitive function where there is disordered energy metabolism and insulin resistance," Professor Wahlqvist said.
The study, which was published in the Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, also involved a number of research institutes in Taiwan.
Story Source:
The above story is based on materials provided by Monash University. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.
Memory
Diabetic diet
Limbic system
Diabetes mellitus type 1
Dementia
Attention
Journal Reference:
Meei-Shyuan Lee, Mark L Wahlqvist, Yu-Ching Chou, Wen-Hui Fang, Jiunn-Tay Lee, Jen-Chun Kuan, Hsiao-Yu Liu, Ting-Mei Lu, Lili Xiu, Chih-Cheng Hsu, Zane B Andrews, Wen-Harn Pan. Turmeric improves post-prandial working memory in pre-diabetes independent of insulin. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr., 2014;23 DOI:10.6133/apjcn.2014.23.4.24
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)